Understanding Buddhist Scriptures

28 lectures to read in sequence.

LECTURE28

2024.05.09

How do words and laws construct self, soul, god, and rebirth in ways that trap people in cultic belief, and what does life beyond those linguistic views look like?

There Is Neither Soul nor God: The Corrupt Discourse, Part 8

The final verse dismantles attachment to law and speech and the paired concepts of self and not-self. It criticizes the way religious language constructs soul, god, rebirth, and declining ages, asking us to abandon these views and become whole here and now.

강의 글 읽기 →

LECTURE27

2024.04.23

Why is the question “Where does the purified one go?” itself a constructed view of existence, and how does understanding non-self remove the need for rebirth?

Genuine Early Buddhism Denies Rebirth: The Corrupt Discourse, Part 7

Reading bhavābhava as constructed views of existence and nonexistence, this chapter argues that one purified of illusion and conceit is not caught by talk of going somewhere after death. The verse concerns present attachment rather than a map of rebirth.

강의 글 읽기 →

LECTURE26

2024.04.16

Why is it difficult even to notice that we inhabit a view, and what observation and comparison can lead us beyond the cave of familiarity and intuition?

Recognizing That You Are Immersed Makes You a Buddha: The Corrupt Discourse, Part 6

Reading diṭṭhinivesa as immersion in views, this chapter explains how views form from experience and how familiar environments become caves. It criticizes the image of an awakened person who must answer instantly and the authority of intuition, proposing comparison and observation as liberation.

강의 글 읽기 →

LECTURE25

2024.04.02

If every law and thought is conditioned by causes, why does treating precepts, merit, rebirth, and religious cosmology as absolute truth conflict with impermanence, non-self, and dependent origination?

Conditioned Things: Without This, One Does Not Understand Buddhism. The Corrupt Discourse, Part 5

Reading saṅkhata as the conditioned, this chapter connects constructed phenomena, impermanence, non-self, and dependent origination. It examines why precepts, merit, rebirth, and the age of declining Dharma offer unstable peace when human systems are mistaken for absolute truth.

강의 글 읽기 →

LECTURE24

2024.03.19

How does Buddhist extinguishment differ from thoughtless obedience to an assigned role, and why does understanding non-self lead beyond the temporary quiet of concentration to a life without conceit?

The Decisive Difference Between Buddhism and Hinduism: Believe and Obey, or Question? Bhagavad Gītā and the Corrupt Discourse, Part 4

The fourth verse's fully extinguished monk is read through the meaning of nirvāṇa. Contrasting Arjuna's commanded obedience in the Bhagavad Gītā with Buddhist questioning, this chapter distinguishes meditative quiet from liberation through understanding and explains how non-self extinguishes conceit.

강의 글 읽기 →

LECTURE23

2024.03.17

Why can precepts and good deeds not become absolute Buddhist standards or cosmic merit, and how can we use rules without falling into pride and religious obedience?

There Is Neither Precept nor Merit: The Corrupt Discourse, Part 3

The third verse examines the mind that boasts of morality and precepts. It criticizes religious displays of austerity, compares the Five Precepts with ancient civil law, and rejects merit as a cosmic reward, presenting rules as human agreements for communal life rather than absolute Buddhist law.

강의 글 읽기 →

LECTURE22

2024.03.15

Why do we fail to see that our views were formed, and why are doubt, questioning, and critical observation necessary to loosen the ideas we desire and enjoy?

Why Must We Escape Attachment to Views? The Corrupt Discourse, Part 2

Following the second verse, this chapter examines how people are led by desire, become immersed in favored views, reach their own conclusions, and then speak as though they truly know. Religious violence, hierarchy, territory, and belief in rebirth show how a conditioned view becomes rigid oppression.

강의 글 읽기 →

LECTURE21

2024.03.13

Why does anger arise, and how can observing the formation of views, desires, and language free us more effectively than a command to suppress anger?

Why Do We Get Angry? The Three Poisons Are Not Poisons: The Corrupt Discourse, Part 1

By retranslating the first verse of the so-called Corrupt Discourse, this chapter reads duṭṭhamanā not as an evil mind but as an angry mind. People become angry because they take their views and wishes as facts, while the muni does not absolutize speech or conditioned views and is therefore rigid nowhere.

강의 글 읽기 →

LECTURE20

2024.03.01

Why does Buddhism ask us to release both worldly possession and the longing for transcendence, and how is freedom from these two extremes related to our everyday agitation?

Seeking Neither the Worldly nor the Transcendent: The Cave Discourse, Part 7

Reading the final three verses of the Cave Discourse, this chapter examines both the illusion of worldly ownership and the longing for a transcendent existence. By understanding contact and perception and removing the second arrow, one enters the path of the muni who is stained by neither extreme.

강의 글 읽기 →

LECTURE19

2024.02.28

Why is seeing and observation more important than belief in Buddhism, and how can moments of emotional and mental agitation become keys to liberation?

Can Buddhism Be Practiced Without Understanding Observation? — The Cave Discourse, Part 6

Beginning from “See those in the world who are agitated,” this chapter examines Buddhism’s decisive verb: see. It traces passati, vipassanā, and the Indo-European family of seeing, then contrasts observable conditions and causality with faith in mystery and makes one’s own agitation the object of practice.

강의 글 읽기 →

LECTURE18

2024.02.26

What is suffering in Buddhism, and how do suffering, liberation, nirvana, and the present connect when Buddhism is understood within the age of the śramaṇas and Upaniṣads?

To Understand Buddhism, Know the Śramaṇas and Upaniṣads — The Cave Discourse, Part 5

Reading “fall into suffering” through dukkhūpanīta, this chapter argues that suffering is not birth, aging, illness, and death themselves but a condition reached by leaving the present through craving and delusion. The intellectual upheaval of the Upaniṣads and śramaṇas, impermanence, and contemplation of death reveal suffering, liberation, nirvana, and equanimity as one structure.

강의 글 읽기 →

LECTURE17

2024.02.24

In an impermanent world of conditions where tomorrow and success cannot be guaranteed, what does it mean to live gathered here and now rather than bound to future or past?

Here and Now — The Cave Discourse, Part 4

Eyes fixed on future success or a finished past move away from the present. Through Hiroshima, the pandemic, business, examinations, and success, this chapter explains impermanence and conditions, life absorbed in the process itself, and a new translation meaning ‘far from now.’

강의 글 읽기 →

LECTURE16

2024.02.22

Why does sensual pleasure bind and addict us, and how does Buddhism understand and release it without suppressing it through asceticism?

Asceticism Is Not Buddhism — The Cave Discourse, Part 3

This chapter reads ‘greedy for sensual pleasure’ through dopamine, reward systems, memory, and conditioning. Using games, luxury brands, cars, gambling, food, sex, and education, it explains that Buddhism does not condemn pleasure but understands and releases addiction.

강의 글 읽기 →

LECTURE15

2024.02.20

How are we bound by the wish that something must exist or that we must become someone in order to be happy, and why must even the final wish to become a Buddha be released?

What Is Required to Become a Buddha? — The Cave Discourse, Part 2

The second verse is read through the author’s life: youthful suffering from wishing reality were different, his father’s death and the dissolution of the question ‘Who are you?’, nirvanic stillness, and finally the release of the image of becoming a Buddha.

강의 글 읽기 →

LECTURE14

2024.02.18

What is the cave in the Cave Discourse, and how can a person bound to familiar thoughts and covered by countless ideas take the first step toward liberation?

Early Buddhism and the Aṭṭhakavagga: The Cave Discourse, Part 1

This chapter critically reads the ancient Aṭṭhakavagga and interprets the ‘cave’ in its first verse not as the body but as the familiar environment and ideas we never question. Liberation is not escape from the body but a way of life that doubts and leaves the images covering us.

강의 글 읽기 →

LECTURE13

2024.02.16

Why is the Heart Sutra’s final section a later addition that contradicts its teaching of emptiness, and why does Buddhism reject the supreme, faith, and mantra?

Buddhism Does Not Ask You to Believe — Heart Sutra, Part 10

The Heart Sutra’s core ends with moving beyond inverted dreams and entering nirvana; its claims about Buddhas of the three times, supreme awakening, and supreme mantra are later additions. Buddhism establishes neither a supreme truth nor faith in the unknown, and every scripture must be distinguished through dependent arising, impermanence, non-self, and emptiness.

강의 글 읽기 →

LECTURE12

2024.02.15

By what historical paths did the Buddha’s ideas of liberation and nirvana influence Western humanism, freedom and equality, science, and modern society?

Liberation and the Modern: The Unknown Buddhist Roots of Western Modernity — Heart Sutra, Part 9

Beginning with human dignity and the pursuit of happiness in Korea’s Constitution, this chapter traces a path through the American and French declarations, Jefferson, Lucretius, Epicurus, and Pyrrho. It examines how Buddhist liberation, nirvana, and skepticism entered the development of Western humanism, freedom, equality, and scientific thought.

강의 글 읽기 →

LECTURE11

2024.02.12

Why should the Heart Sutra’s ‘no fear’ be understood as ‘no agitation,’ and what does nirvanic stillness mean in actual life when the mind’s obstructions have disappeared?

Not ‘No Fear’ but ‘No Agitation’: Heart Sutra, Part 8

This chapter reads the Heart Sutra’s phrase commonly rendered as ‘no fear’ as ‘no agitation.’ When wisdom removes the obstruction in the mind, one moves far beyond inverted dreams and enters nirvanic stillness—the extinguishing of the fires of affliction and the arising of equanimity.

강의 글 읽기 →

LECTURE10

2024.02.10

What were the original forms of dependent origination and the Four Noble Truths preserved in an early stratum of the Sutta Nipāta, and how do they explain a practical way out of suffering?

The Twelve Links of Dependent Origination Were Fabricated: Heart Sutra, Part 7, and Sutta Nipāta Chapter 4, Sutta 11

This chapter reads the early structures of dependent origination and the Four Noble Truths preserved in Sutta Nipāta 4.11. It traces suffering backward through attachment, desire, pleasure and displeasure, contact, and name-and-form, showing how later formulations centered on rebirth and birth, aging, sickness, and death altered an originally practical inquiry.

강의 글 읽기 →

LECTURE09

2024.02.08

If all dharmas are empty of self-nature, why must even basic Buddhist doctrines such as the five aggregates, twelve bases, eighteen elements, twelve links, and Four Noble Truths be denied and criticized again?

Why Does the Heart Sutra Deny Basic Buddhist Doctrines? — Heart Sutra, Part 6

Applying dharma-emptiness to the five aggregates, twelve bases, eighteen elements, twelve links, and Four Noble Truths, this talk argues that even Buddhism’s basic doctrines cannot be absolute truth. It reads “no wisdom and no attainment” through skepticism and self-criticism, then questions birth, aging, sickness, death, “all is suffering,” rebirth, and no dependence on words while reconsidering scriptural formation through bibliography and linguistics.

강의 글 읽기 →